An early alley

121013

It’s hard to believe it’s been almost four years since I took this photo.

I’d gone to Abilene, Texas, for the weekend to meet up with a friend. After she headed back home I stuck around town for a while and took some photographs. This was before I’d figured out the wealth of interesting things a photographer can see in downtown alleys, so I only took a few shots. Now, of course, I’d take a few dozen shots. Per block.

But maybe this is where I started figuring out about alleys….

Abilene, Texas
photographed 4.3.2010

Posted on December 10, 2013, in Photography and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 14 Comments.

  1. As much as I like this shot I must say that I don’t do much alley shooting these days. It seems that most of the alleys worth photographing are in some (what’s a good word) unsafe parts of town. In the days when I did shoot alleys I shot very early Sunday mornings, a time of day when all was quiet and I felt relatively safe walking around with an expensive camera. The police have stepped up patrols on these high crime drug infested parts of town but it still isn’t a good idea to be wandering alone in my opinion. I don’t do it now. I’m not saying that the alleys you shoot are like this and that you don’t take reasonable precautions, and I don’t mean to put the fear into you, but please – be safe.

    Like

  2. It’s always good to see a shot like this where the photographer has gone to the trouble of correcting all the verticals. It makes such a difference to the geometric content.

    Like

    • Thanks, Andy. Non-vertical verticals tend to catch my eye. And not in a good way, either. My friend Brett Erickson (do you know his work? – http://brettlerickson.wordpress.com/) thinks I need a tilt-shift lens, and he may be right. However, there’s the matter of the cost (a lot!) and the learning curve (steep!) that have held me back…

      Like

      • Thanks for the link to Brett’s blog. I’ve never owned a tilt-shift lens and never will. Yet one more piece of kit to consider carrying and I rarely have any difficulty correcting verticals. The biggest problem that occurs with lens correction is that part of the original image can get moved off the image edge during the correction. If I notice that is happening and the ‘lost’ bit is important, then I re-start by enlarging the canvas sufficiently in the required direction so that the bit I potentially lose remains on the canvas and is retained as part of the final image. I hope that makes sense…

        Like

      • The other part of using a tilt-shift lens is that it doesn’t fit my style of shooting: I don’t like to spent ages setting up one shot!

        As we’ve discussed before, my evolving Photoshop skills let me salvage shots that were not usable. Fixing verticals and converging verticals is something I’ve been working hard on learning. Enlarging the canvas is a trick I use as well (I’ve got a shot queued up on the blog in a few days where I did that very thing).

        Like

      • Sounds like we are reading from the same page, Melinda.

        Like

      • Yes, it does! What version of Photoshop are you on? I recently upgraded from CS 5 to the CC version; I like it a lot, even with the monthly fee I’ve got to pay.

        Like

      • I’m using CS5 – I really haven’t quite grasped yet what is involved in the CC version. It seems like I don’t have an option if I want to upgrade, but I don’t like it when I put in that ‘take it or leave it’ situation.

        Like

      • The part I DID like – enough to jump on board, eventually – was that the CC version is always updated. I am kind of dork about wanting the most current versions of, well, nearly anything…

        Like

  3. I need to remember about converging verticals too – I have only ever corrected them in one photo, at Melinda’s suggestion. Lightroom has the ability to do it, so I won’t need new software, just more awareness.
    Nice alley – a good place to start on a multi-year project!

    Like

Leave a comment