church

011314

Another view of this church, taken on the same day, over a year and a half ago.

I just went by this place at Christmas, and it looked about the same. Maybe a few more shingles have blown away, and perhaps the building’s succumbed to gravity just a tiny bit more. But, mostly – the same.

Only this happened, and it’s not the first time: scenes that I’ve photographed always seem much smaller when I see them again. What’s with that? Also this: I shoot in color and convert to monochrome. But once I’ve converted a photo, I have very little (or no) memory of what the colors used to be.

(My mind: it’s scary in here.)

Young County, Texas
photographed 5.27.2012

Posted on January 13, 2014, in architecture, Photography and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 14 Comments.

  1. I admire both versions of this church. Although I like looking at things that are falling apart, in the case of both your photographs of this church I think what does it for me the most is the wonderful light, maybe especially in the clouds in this shot and on the grass in the other one.

    Like

  2. I like what Linda mentioned in her comment but the best thing about this particular photo is the framing. Outstanding!

    Like

  3. Not scary, not scary: interesting, creative, unique… I mean inside your mind…
    PS: I love photos of tall growing wild grass.

    Like

    • My son (Nathan, the one you read about on the other blog) has a mind similar to mine. He says his mind is powered by a ping-pong playing monkey. I don’t know what that means, exactly, but it would account for, well, a lot.

      Like

  4. Interesting to be able to make the comparison between the two shots, Melinda. I prefer the other one – to my mind the lightness and brightness has more of a spiritual feel to it, this one feels a little foreboding. I’m interested by your last sentence. When I convert an image to B&W that is always done in Photoshop and saved under the same file number but with a suffix ‘_BW’. That was the original RAW colour version is fully preserved.

    Like

    • I keep the original RAW images as well. Because you just never know what else might need to be done on the photo. But while those original RAW shots hang out in my archive, and the modified versions live on the blog, I really do forget what the scene looked like in color; when I see one of the original photos, I usually say something to myself along the lines of, “Oh…that fence was GREEN!”

      Thanks for comment comparing the two shots of the church. I very rarely sit down to work on a shot with the idea of making it look a particular way. If there were a way (an easy way, I mean!) of tracking my state of mind when I worked on the photos to the relative lightness/darkness of the final images, I wonder if a correlation would emerge?

      Like

  5. I love the textured foreground – one of your hallmarks, though not usually grass. Sad to see these buildings sagging into oblivion.

    Like

Leave a comment